Monday, August 5, 2013

Tiny tourist town re-elects 4-year-old as mayor

DORSET, Minn. - The tiny tourist town of Dorset has re-elected its mayor -- a short guy -- known for his fondness of ice cream and fishing.

Mayor Robert "Bobby" Tufts is 4-years-old. He was re-elected in what was not an ordinary election.

Dorset, an unincorporated town, is holding its annual Taste of Dorset Festival. A drawing is held and the winner gets to be mayor. Anyone can vote as many times as they like -- for $1 a vote -- at any of the ballot boxes in stores around town.

Bobby was running for a second term. On Sunday, he drew the winning name which just so happened to be his own.

Bobby was only three when he won the election last year as mayor of Dorset. Dorset, which bills itself as the Restaurant Capital of the World, has no formal city government.

Bobby's job as mayor is to greet people as they come to Dorset, located among the pines and lakes of northern Minnesota about 150 miles northwest of Minneapolis.

Resorts and tourism are the main industry,and restaurants ranging from Mexican to Italian to family style line about two blocks on either side of the highway that runs through the middle of town.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/52675091/ns/local_news-minneapolis_st_paul_mn/

meningitis bobby valentine bobby valentine Karrueche Tran miguel cabrera dodd frank Lark Voorhies

State Board Member Challenges Stotsky and Wurman

On July 20th, we published an article entitled ?What do the CC math authors say about them?? In this article we shared comments the 2 math-field related authors (Zimba and McCallum) of the Common Core standards made.

On July 25th, the Deseret News published an op-ed from Dr. Sandra Stotsky entitled ?This is why I oppose Common Core? and in which she quotes Zimba and McCallum?s remarks. Dr. Stotsky has been quoting them ever since their remarks were first made in 2010 at the time the Common Core standards were released.

On August 2nd, the Deseret News published an op-ed response from state school board member Jennifer Johnson entitled ?Clarifying Criticism of Common Core.? ?In her response, Jennifer takes issue with Dr. Stotsky?s quote on Zimba, and received an email from McCallum stating that Ze?ev Wurman misunderstood comments he made at a meeting in 2010 in San Diego.

Here?s where the story gets interesting.

I received this email from Dr. Stotsky which she sent to the Deseret News after reading Jennifer?s op-ed.

Jennifer Johnson contacted me several times in the past few weeks about the official minutes of the March 2010 meeting of the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.? According to the official minutes of the meeting, Jason Zimba told the Board and others at this large public meeting that ?the concept of college readiness is minimal and focuses on non-selective colleges.?? I was a member of this Board at the time and heard Professor Zimba?s comments on the meaning of college readiness in Common Core?s mathematics standards.

Rhoda Schneider, the chief legal counsel for the Board, usually writes up and/or approves the minutes of every meeting, and the minutes were approved by about a dozen people?Board members and the Commissioner of Education?the next month. http://www.doe.mass.edu/boe/minutes/10/0323reg.pdf.

Most or all of these people were at the meeting at which Professor Zimba spoke. ?I have been referring to these minutes and Professor Zimba?s comments for several years.? The minutes have not changed since they were officially approved in April 2010.

I wrote back to Ms. Johnson and suggested that if there were any concerns about the accuracy of the official minutes, she should feel free to contact Ms. Schneider at rschneider@doe.mass.edu. I am obviously not the person to question the official minutes of the meeting.

Jennifer failed to note in her op-ed that Jason Zimba?s quote by Dr. Stotsky is straight out of the official board minutes of the March 2010 Massachusetts Board of Education?something Dr. Stotsky pointed her to much prior to her op-ed. That omission of an important fact in determining the real story is troubling. For 3 years Jason?s statements have been available and quoted by Dr. Stotsky. Jason has never sought to change the official record, and the MA state superintendent and a dozen board members including Dr. Stotsky who was on the board at that time, authenticated the minutes as correct.

I also received this email from Ze?ev Wurman after he read Jennifer?s op-ed.

Editor,

In her Aug.2, 2013 OpEd, State School Board Member Jennifer Johnson quotes William McCallum:

?In January 2010, six months before the standards were finalized, I gave a presentation about them at the joint meetings of the American Mathematical Society and the Mathematical Association of America in San Diego. After the presentation, one audience member expressed a worry that the standards would be too high (as in excessively high). I replied that they would not be too high and that they would be equal to the standards of high achieving East Asian countries. In context, it was clear that I meant ?not excessively high,? but the phrase ?not too high,? taken out of context, can be interpreted colloquially as ?not very high.? This is the way Wurman, who was there, chose to misinterpret it, despite the fact that my meaning was crystal clear from the context.?

Prof. McCallum is engaging here in a bit of historical revisionism. The report of his statement at the time is as follows: (http://toped.svefoundation.org/2010/01/17/common-core-standards-under-fire/ )

?While acknowledging the concerns about front-loading demands in early grades, [McCallum] said that the overall standards would not be too high, certainly not in comparison other nations, including East Asia, where?math education excels.?

From the ?certainly? in the ?certainly not in comparison to other nations? and from the reference to East Asia ?where math education excels? it is clear that McCallum meant that the Common Core will be lower, rather than equal to those of other nations, as he currently wants us to believe.

McCallum did not correct the original report at the time nor until recently, when that quote became evidence of an embarrassing admission. To put his modern recollection of the past in a sharper relief, McCallum?s memory is not as perfect as it seems ? that joint meeting in January 2010 took place in San Francisco rather than in San Diego.

Ze?ev Wurman

The fact that Zimba and McCallum have changed their tune from the time of the standards being released, to something different now, indicates to me that they?ve come under some pressure to change their stances, not that they have been misrepresented from that time period as Jennifer would lead us to believe.

Source: http://www.utahnsagainstcommoncore.com/state-board-member-challenges-stotsky-and-wurman/

Columbine shooting Ryan Lanza Facebook Connecticut shooting Nancy Lanza school shootings Jenni Rivera Adam Lanza Facebook

Sunday, August 4, 2013

Tech Talk ? The Latest Canadian Oil Spill

Posted on by The Oil Drum in Canada

This post is seeded by a note from Luis de Sousa (h/t Luis) who noted a story in Mother Jones. That story, in turn, fed from one in the Toronto Star and is about surface contamination of oil, coming from the underlying tar sands and emerging as a watery bitumen mixture over at least four areas in the Cold Lake region of Alberta. The story is difficult to report, since the contamination is centered within the Cold Lake Air Missile Range, where the Canadian military fires and tests live weapons. Unfortunately, as written, it seems to have some technical ...

Read more from The Oil Drum

Source: http://fuelfix.com/blog/2013/08/04/tech-talk-the-latest-canadian-oil-spill/

PGA Championship 2012 John Witherspoon george michael usain bolt Closing Ceremony London 2012 Tom Daley Leryn Franco

Md. lawsuit arising from death in Aruba dropped (Providence Journal)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/323612927?client_source=feed&format=rss

Jonathan Winters Justin Bieber Anne Frank will ferrell coachella zack greinke zack greinke jackie robinson

Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer and Car Accident Attorney Shares ...

Did you know that of the top 10 leading causes of death world-wide, car accidents placed 9th overall and first among the top 10 accident-related deaths?

As if car accident statistics like this aren?t alarming enough, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration someone is involved in a car accident every ten seconds with a car accident related death happening approximately once every 12 minutes!

Car accident statistics like these and the fact that over 40,000 Americans have fatal injuries in automobile related accidents every year are the reason why automobile accidents have become a national epidemic.

Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer Explains the Leading Causes of Car Accidents?

As a Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer practicing in the Kingsbridge / Riverdale section of the Bronx, I have seen many different types of car accidents ranging from rear end collisions to head on collisions to jack knife and rollovers. Regardless of the type of collision, car accidents are often the result of one of three things:

1. Driver Recklessness, Distraction or Negligence
2. Defective Vehicles or Vehicle Parts
3. Roadway and Weather Conditions

Let?s look at each of these causes now one by one?

1. Driver Negligence, Distraction or Recklessness:
Many car accidents are commonly credited to motorist neglect or recklessness. Reckless driving behaviors such as driving under the influence are criminal as well. Drunk driving often result in fatalities (car accident statistics show this to be 40% of all traffic related deaths) and other serious car accident related injuries such as paralysis and traumatic brain injury. Other careless and negligent driver behaviors, like talking or ?texting? on a cell phone, changing radio stations or even putting on makeup, may only result in a summons and/or points against the driver?s license, but these low speed collisions result in serious soft tissue personal injuries such as whiplash as well as broken bones and? fractures. Many of the car accident victims and pedestrian injuries I see as a personal injury lawyer practicing here in the Bronx are the result of such negligent behaviors.

Other forms of driver negligence include speeding, disobeying stop signs or yield signs and even? rubbernecking. Aggressive driving behaviors such as cutting in and out of lanes, not giving way to other motorists or pedestrians or challenging other drivers to a street race add to the rising number of car accidents per year.

2. Automobiles Defects and Negligence:
Did you know that the design of an SUV makes it less stable on the road and 4 times more likely to rollover in an accident as compared to passenger cars? Flaws in car design, faulty automobile components, and improper auto upkeep on the part of the car owner are significant reasons for car accidents. Malfunctioning air bags, safety belts, car seats, door latches, ignition and fuel systems are just some of the contributing factors in the injuries and damages that happen as a result of car accidents due to car manufacturer defects. So be sure to adhere to factory recalls. If you have an older car, check online from time to time for updates on your make and model to see if there is a recall on your vehicle.

3. Roadway and Weather Conditions:
While we have no control over nature?s elements we do have control of the decision to drive in bad weather. Conditions such as snow, sleet and rain (with or without the proper tires) increase your risk of being involved in an accident. For this reason, driving without first considering the weather and resulting road conditions may be considered negligence on the part of the driver. Different weather and road conditions require that a drive change the speed and way that he or she operates the vehicle compared with normal conditions.

You don?t have to be a Personal Injury Lawyer or Car Accident Attorney to know that a motor vehicle? accident can occur at any moment and cause serious personal injuries, including death. By being aware of the important car accident statistics as well as the common causes of car accidents many accidents can be avoided.

Trust a Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer and Car Accident Attorney Who Has Been Fighting For the Rights of Bronx Residents Over 20 Years!

Stuart Kerner Esq.If you are injured as a driver or passenger in a car accident and are in need of a Bronx Car Accident Attorney or Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer, at the Law Offices of Stuart M. Kerner, located in the Riverdale section of the Bronx, we have great experience in assessing personal injuries and their causes including car accident cases. If you would like a legal opinion on the potential value of your personal injury matter or have a question about your rights, contact our office toll-free at 888-475-7544 or click here to schedule a FREE Consultation online so we can evaluate your case. Insurance companies have lawyers protecting their interest, so why not have a Bronx Personal Injury Lawyer and Bronx Car Accident Lawyer protect yours!

Source: http://yourbronxlawyers.com/blog/bronx-personal-injury-lawyer-and-car-accident-attorney-shares-with-drivers-important-car-accident-statistics/

new jersey atlantic city ocean city maryland KDKA Pumpkin Carving Ideas Hurricane Sandy path sandy

Jury recommends life sentences for Somali pirates

(AP) ? A jury recommended Friday that three Somali pirates be sentenced to life in prison in the slayings of four Americans aboard a yacht off the coast of Africa.

Prosecutors had sought the death penalty, and 22 of the 26 crimes they were convicted of were death-eligible offenses. But a federal jury in Norfolk, Va., recommended the only other possible sentence for 20-year-old Ahmed Muse Salad, 25-year-old Abukar Osman Beyle and 29-year-old Shani Nurani Shiekh Abrar.

During the sentencing phase of the trial, defense attorneys attempted to raise doubts about the certainty of the crimes the jury had convicted them of. Salad attorney Claire Cardwell noted that nobody was able to definitively say which person shot which victim, and that much of the evidence presented relied on testimony of other convicted pirates. If the jury and the government wanted to dole out justice by taking an eye for an eye, "Which eye, for which eye?" she asked.

Formal sentencing for the men will take place in October and November, and they will face numerous life sentences and additional time.

The three men were among 19 who boarded the Quest in February 2011 several hundred miles off the coast of Somalia in hopes of taking the Americans back to Somalia and ransoming them for millions of dollars. The plan fell apart when the U.S. Navy began shadowing the sailing vessel.

The yacht's owners, Jean and Scott Adam of Marina del Rey, Calif., and their friends, Bob Riggle and Phyllis Macay of Seattle, were shot to death a few days after negotiations with the Navy broke down.

"Scott Adam, Jean Adam, Phyllis Macay, and Robert Riggle lost their lives and their families lost their loved ones. Nothing can make this right; nothing can make their families whole again - but we hope today's verdict and sentences will bring some closure to their nightmare that began two years ago on the Indian Ocean," U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride said in a statement.

The Navy had told the pirates that they could keep the yacht and a small Navy boat in exchange for the hostages, but they refused to take the deal because they didn't believe they would get enough money. The only person authorized to negotiate the Americans' release was also based in Somalia.

With the yacht nearing the Somali coastline, the destroyer USS Sterett began maneuvering between the Quest and the Somali shore when a rocket-propelled grenade was fired at it. Soon after, gunshots were fired on board the Quest. Prosecutors said the murders were planned, as evidenced by threats from the pirates to the Navy, but Cardwell said that made no sense for them to kill their hostages. By the time Navy SEALs scrambled aboard, all four Americans had been mortally wounded. Prosecutors said the Americans had been shot 41 times.

"Let's call it what it is. It was a massacre," Assistant U.S. Attorney Joseph DePadilla told jurors while arguing for the death penalty during closing arguments earlier this week.

The victims were the first U.S. citizens killed in a wave of pirate attacks that have plagued the Gulf of Aden and Indian Ocean in recent years. In their justification for seeking the death penalty, prosecutors wrote that the men killed or attempted to kill more than one person during a single episode. They also said their actions endangered the U.S. military and that the Americans were killed "in an especially wanton and gratuitous manner."

In the case of Salad, prosecutors said he has demonstrated a lack of remorse in the Americans' deaths and made boastful statements about them.

Defense attorneys for Salad had argued he should not be eligible for the death penalty because they claimed he is mentally handicapped. Defense documents say Salad has a low IQ, a poor memory and had difficulty functioning as a child in Somalia. Defense attorneys also noted in court filings that his co-defendants describe Salad as "slow" and inept at fishing.

The U.S. Supreme Court has banned executing those with certain mental disabilities.

Prosecutors argued Salad is competent, and Chief U.S. District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith issued an order that concurred with that assessment.

The decision to seek the death penalty was made by Attorney General Eric Holder. Executions under federal law are extremely rare. Only a handful out of more than 1,300 executions since 1976 having been carried out by the federal government, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, which tracks statistics.

Eleven other defendants who were aboard the Quest have already pleaded guilty to piracy and have been sentenced to life in prison.

Four other suspected pirates were killed aboard the yacht. A fifth suspected pirate was released because he was a juvenile. Another man who prosecutors say was a land-based negotiator and the highest-ranking pirate they've ever captured has also been convicted of piracy and sentenced to a dozen life sentences in prison.

Michael Scharf is a Case Western Reserve University international law professor who has provided training for prosecutors in other piracy cases around the world. He noted that this case was different because most pirates convicted in other countries receive relatively light sentences.

"To the Somalians, who live in miserable conditions, a short sentence in a foreign jail, where they receive three meals a day, exercise, and educational training, isn't much of a deterrent," Scharf said in an email. "So the U.S. sought the ultimate punishment, not just because U.S citizens happened to be the victims, but to send the strongest possible signal. That the jury returned a life sentence instead may blunt that somewhat."

___

Brock Vergakis can be reached at www.twitter.com/BrockVergakis

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/386c25518f464186bf7a2ac026580ce7/Article_2013-08-02-Prosecuting%20Pirates/id-2f648a1e4e14472c81f7125dbf166a90

French Open 2013 dunkin donuts NBA 2K14 Roland Garros bay news 9 George Karl Shannon Rogers Guess Richardson

Reexamining the Definition of Cancer

A viewpoint published in The Journal of the American Medical Association recommended refining the definition of cancer and reexamining how the disease is detected and treated. Laura Esserman, one of the authors, and Larry Norton, from Memorial Sloan-Kettering, discuss what a new definition would mean.

Source: http://www.npr.org/2013/08/02/208270038/reexamining-the-definition-of-cancer?ft=1&f=1007

ostara andy kaufman masters 2012 tom watson kawasaki disease resurrection masters tickets